Visit Synthesis's column >>

SYNTHESIS

Running Dog
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 240; Links Seeded: 2346
Member Since: 9/2006

Who is the Queen of the Scandal Sheets?

The Louisiana Train Wreck in happier times. Rolling Stone lingerie pic blatantly lifted from howardlindzon.com, who probably didn't have permission to use it

A nude Paris is all wrapped up in her quest to become Queen of the Tabloids. Pic comes to us from hollywood-celebrity-pictures.com, who probably also 'borrowed' it

Classic Angeline Jolie cleavage pic copied from myclassiclyrics.com. Who knows where they got it from

Lindsay Lohan nude and channelling Marilyn. New York Magazine pic by Bert Stern via gothamist.com

See, Katie Holmes can look sultry. She must have posed in this see-through top specifically for hotcelebritypics.blogspot, cuz that's where I got it from

I got this shot from photobucket.com. Clearly, they have photomanipulation software; both Nicole and her cleavage look pretty good here

Posh Spice in a bikini top, before she was abducted by aliens who performed all manner of plastic surgery on her. Photo from the blog 'The Ramblings of Scott' (clearly, Scott is a photog based in the U.K.)

I got this bikini photo from a site called jessicasimpsonmusic.net. Which means it's OK, since she must own it, right?

advertisement

Welcome to my first-ever and inaugural attempt to break Google Analytics by publishing an article whose tags are intentionally calculated to set fire to the Google search function. The somewhat skimpy excuse for piling all these internet search-bait skanks into a single article is a pseudo-scholarly inquiry into the nature of celebrity. In this article, we will pose the question, "what is it about these horrible, horrible women that causes idle bystanders in supermarket checkout lines (not to mention the internet) to become so wholly fixated on them." We will explore whether, for the sake of some kind of Manichaean duality, Jennifer Aniston shouldn't have been included on the list to balance Angelina.

Seriously, though, this article will attempt to quantify why these eight women so fascinate the public despite (because of?) their (generally) apparent shallowness. In order to establish weighted criteria for our evaluations, we polled our readership (okay...you caught me...I asked a couple of guys at work, awright?) about those factors that constitute a real staple of tabloid readership. Since not all factors are equal, we've assigned a relative value to each criteria, as follows:

  • Hotness -- worth a possible 20 points
  • Craziness -- worth a possible 30 points
  • Global Notoriety -- worth a possible 20 points
  • Scandalous Behaviour -- worth a possible 30 points
  • Altogether, these potential points add up to a possible total of 100, just because here at the Primary Sources column we're sympathetic souls, and we feel as though there should be one chance, in some universe, for one of these women to earn a mark approximating 100%.

    So, wishing the competitors the best of luck and readying the grand prize (a month's supply of Valtrex, 200 tabs of Respiradol and a complimentary certificate for one free Tijauna divorce) we herewith open the contest. May the best worst example win!

    Angelina Jolie

    I have a number of friends who believe Angie is the hottest creature on the face of the earth. And since she snagged Brad Pitt, often referred to as the Sexiest Man Alive (when that title is not being awarded to George Clooney or Matt Damon), who am I to argue? Angie gets 19 out of 20 possible hotness points, with only one point held in reserve because nobody's perfect.

    For craziness, she starts out of the gate strong by wearing a vial of blood around her neck and scarring herself with knives as part of foreplay. Plus, she gets bonus crazy points for considering Billy Bob Thornton beddable. But she fails in the home stretch due to her more recent responsible behaviour adopting famine babies and ambassadorring for the U.N. Too bad, Angie, you were on a roll there for a while. Final crazy score? A weak 15, strictly for old time's sake.

    For global notoriety, she gets a weak score of 8. She just hasn't ruffled enough feathers, especially lately. If it were a global 'good guy' fame contest, she'd have done better, but that's not the name of the game with this contest. After all, we've got to pander to the lowest possible denominator somehow.

    Similarly on the scandalous behaviour front, Angie's just been too well-behaved lately. She could have made up some points for stealing Brad from Jen, but even that was characterized by too little hint of misbehaviour. Result? A too-upright score of 9.

    Total Score for Angelina Jolie? A meagre 51 out of 100.

    Britney Spears

    At first glance, Britt-Britt, today's most celebrated train wreck is a no-brainer (poor Brit) for the overall title. Put away your spreadsheets, boys, we've got a winner. Ding ding! (or is that ding dang?). But wait! In the interest of the scientific method (and to give poor ol' Katie Holmes at least a chance of being considered (after all, she went to the trouble of marrying Tom Cruise, for chrissakes...let 'er have her shot!), we need to go through the motions. So here we go.

    For hotness, Britney starts off with an impressive score, based on the degree to which she was on every boy's wish list a couple of years back. Her aerobicized, verging-on-womanhood, carefully managed image launched a thousand...er...ad campaigns. But, flash forward to today, where she has become a puffy parody of her former self, sadly wrapping her bloated carcass around a stripper pole to a vast yawn of indifference. Today, a full-blown porn tape is about the only thing that could resurrect any interest in poor, oft-institutionalized Britney as an object of desire. Hotness score? A charitable 8 out of 20, and that only because there's still an out out-of-touch adolescent or two out there saying "I'd still hit that".

    For craziness points, Britney is the gold standard. Hospitalized twice in the full glare of the public eye, trailing incidents of bizarre behaviour behind her like a veil of toilet paper stuck to her shoe, they don't come much crazier than she does. The only thing keeping Britney from racking up the maximum points in this category is the nagging feeling that if the paparazzi followed me 24-7 they'd observe some pretty weird stuff too...total score, 26 out of 30.

    For global notoriety, well, they don't come more well-known than Britney. There are Yanomamo Indians darting spider monkeys in the rain forest who can lip synch all the words to Oops! I Did it Again. But she fails to get all the points she could, because all things being equal, outside the hot media glare of the U.S., she's still just as famous for her stardom as she is for her freaked-out hi-jinks. Remember, the Yanomamo don't get TMZ. So, her final global notoriety score comes in at a still-respectable 14 out of 20.

    Scandalous behaviour ups the ante for Britt. Her nanosecond marriage, her strangely unwatchable reality show, her weird performance at the school she showed up at, her willingness to share her clam-dip recipe with the world, her ambulance rides, replete with helicopter escort. Once again, gold standard. Brit gets 28 (see porno flick reference above, if you're wondering why she didn't get full marks).

    Total points for the Louisiana Train-Wreck? A surprisingly underachieving 76.

    Nicole Richie

    Clearly the red-headed stepchild in this contest, underdog Nicole Richie has her work cut out for her. But having observed her as she essayed her bid for broadcast immortality in The Simple Life, there's one thing we know about Nicole: she never knows when to shut up. So, it's only fitting that we let her get her two cents in here. For hotness points, the perpetually overshadowed Nicole -- whether she's bloated or stick thin -- gets a scant 8 out of 20 (I mean, we couldn't score her higher than Britney. Her search engine performance doesn't warrant it, no matter the circumstances).

    Given her behaviour in her TV series, you could be forgiven for wondering if Nicole isn't suffering from some sort of imbalance. But it seems not. The degree to which she's traumatized her poor adoptive father Lionel notwithstanding, overall, she doesn't seem to be completely nuts. She gets a base allotment of 10 for presumed issues just being a Hollywood brat, and I'll give her a couple of eating disorder points, but that's as much as I can do. Total crazy score? 12.

    Nicole scores an anemic 6 on the global notoriety scale, and that only to the degree to which you can say "Paris Hilton and Nicole Richie" in a single breath in Japanese. Nicole is just not an international superstar (or whatever the others are).

    She's also an underperformer in the scandalous behaviour realm. I'm just starting to feel sorry for Nicole, so I'll give her a pity 'pass' -- 15 points. Total score? 41 out of 100.

    Paris Hilton

    Queen of the tabs? Let's see, shall we? When we evaluating the paparazzi's wet dream against our ever-so-scientific sliding scale of salaciousness, we come up with the following results:

    Hotness - well, Paris is considered a bit scrawny by some, and she's got that perpetual "daddy, give me some money look", which some find to be a turn-on, but then again, some don't. Still, skinniness hasn't been the cause of any models being whisked off the catwalk in a gale-force wind lately, so the public's increasing awareness of healthy body image notwithstanding, we'll have to allow it. 16 out of 20, with two points removed for her reliance on hair extensions. Final score, 14.

    Is Paris crazy? Like a fox, I'd say. Her ditzy persona notwithstanding, no 'celebrity' works harder at remaining in the public eye. This is a girl who intentionally undergoes six to eight wardrobe changes a day. So all her shenanigans notwithstanding, she's just far too calculating to be truly bughouse without the aid of copious alcohol intake. 17 out of 30.

    For global notoriety, Paris is clearly an overachiever. The object behind the definition of 'famous for being famous', she's not only globally recognizable, her fame is accompanied by the kind of hushed, dirty whispers that used to make Mr Wilson demand I share my secret with the rest of the class back in grade 5. Paris is notorious on a scale that eclipses even Ingrid Bergman and Liz Taylor in years past, and so she gets a coveted 18 out of 20 possible Primary Sources points.

    When it comes to heiresses behaving badly, they don't come much more ill-behaved than Paris. Whether it's flashing her rodent at the press, blowing Rick Salomon on camera (and come to think of it, maybe we should rethink that crazy score) or getting fresh lodgings in the crowbar hotel, Paris is truly gifted when it comes to scandal. I'm really just waiting for what she'll come up with next to relieve the boredom of our poor, shock-poor existences. My assessment? A whopping 28. And if her crazy score were higher she could have easily reached a Comaneci-esque perfect score.

    Paris' total? She's the one to beat so far with 77, a true paean to the ability of today's celebrities to get down on their knees to please their fans.

    Lindsay Lohan

    It's sad (and a little creepy) to observe that Lindsay was consideredmore attractive when she was playing a minor in Disney films. And her rather desparate sucking up to Marilyn Monroe in New York Magazine didn't help, even though she finally displayed her ample bosom, after teasing fans with nip slips and cleavage for so long. Look. It's cool she's a redhead (mostly), and it's even great that she's a little on the zaftig side from time to time. We can't populate the entire pantheon of celebrityhood with Lara Flynn Boyle clones. But she's not even 22 for gawd's sake, and she looks like 20 miles of bad road. Farrah Fawcett looks like she's had a more stress-free existence. Lindsay gets 13.

    Lindsay is clearly reckless, addictive, unrepentant and alcholic. But crazy? Well....maybe a little. She's certainly a little bit troubled, and quite obviously more out of control than Alec Baldwin's ego. But her mental illness doesn't meet the sniff test. Based on the fact that she's a clear candidate for Celebrity Intervention, and so is obviously in some level of cerebral distress, and given who her mother is, I'll give her a 19 out of 30. If she were to act out in a more incomprehensible manner she could do better, but as bad as she behaves, she hasn't done anything I haven't seen during a typical Frosh week.

    On the notoriety front, Lindsay is not all that well known outside of North America. And, like Britney, she's still reasonably well-regarded for the jaw-dropping fidelity of her performance in Freaky Friday (all kidding aside, Mean Girls wasn't bad). I have the utmost faith that she will continue to screw up and will therefore see he notoriety swell from its current flaccid state to a veritable behemoth of embarassment fit to shame even her monstrous stage mom, but for now I gotta give LiLo a 12 out of 30.

    As for scandalousness, it's actually hard to find too much. A couple of poor man-choices, a flaunting of a house-arrest leg bracelet her or there, and a driving/drugs/alcohol infraction or two or three or four. Really, just another night on Sunset Boulevard. She's trying though, so I'll give her a passing score of 15, with two bonus points for posing topless. Final scandal tally? 17 out of 30, for an overall score of 61.

    Posh Spice

    Okay, I gotta come out with it. These days, Posh looks like a gray alien from Zeta Reticuli. She looks like a popsicle stick with a couple of grapes glued on, and those impossibly tight sheath dresses and tottering high heels don't help matters. Still, she's photogenic....She gets a nominal 10.

    I've seen absolutely zero evidence of dementia on the part of Posh, although there are times when those limpid deer-eyes start to look a little crazed. And, she gets a couple of mental illness points for her probable eating disorder. Overall, though, for a specimen of Hollywoodiana, she's remarkably sane (and as further evidence, I submit her rejection of Tom Cruise's Scientological overtures). Posh gets a 8 out of 30. She's got that bobble-head screwed on too straight.

    In North America, it's not always easy to recognize the global impact of a celebrity like Posh. The Spice Girls were cataclysmically popular worldwide, so she gets quite a few global notoriety points just for her fame. It's offset by the fact that her notoriety is largely just legitimate fame, so Posh Spice rings in with a global notoriety score of just 12.

    Scandalous behaviour? Jeez, I'm not even aware of any! Maybe...maybe...well, she got some headlines for saying she sleeps in the nude...Migod, that's weak! Chalk it up to British reserve. 5 out of 30.

    Posh tallies up a less-than-spicy 35.

    Jessica Simpson

    I precede this by saying that I'm pretty sure Jessica is over. It's quite likely that she jumped the shark with The Dukes of Hazzard, and she never should have left that nice Nick Lachey. But, let's see if her residual tabloidiness is enough to salvage some supermarket aisle placement for poor ol' Jess.

    It's a good thing for Jessica that she has those boobs. That, her lustrous blonde hair, pearl-white teeth, long legs, and above-average singing voice is all she has going for her. That said, the amount of times her father has unbuttoned her blouse and shoved her in front of the camera creeps me out more than reading about Jeffrey Dahmer. Joe Simpson is a major creep, and that -- justly or unjustly -- bites into Jessica's hotness score. She'll still do okay with 16, though.

    Craziness is not the same as dumb. And I'm pretty sure she's not as air-headed as she pretends. Still, she's been known to use the phrase "oh my gaw" in the belief that the Lord will not strike her dead since she's avoiding (ever so cleverly) committing blasphemy, so she gets some base points. And a couple more just for listening to her dad. Ever. 13 points.

    Call it the result of her so-called Christianity, but Jessica is pretty much notoriety-free. She gets a couple of points for being viewed by many as the cause of the Dallas Cowboys' playoff collapse, and two more for her jiggly, content-free Dukes of Hazzard role, but mostly she fails in this category. Global notoriety score is 7.

    For scandalous behaviour? See above. 7.

    Jessica ends up with 43.

    Katie Holmes

    I like smart chicks. Katie comes off as smart (more on this later). And she's cute, even if she's no Angie Jolie. For hotness, she gets a lukewarm 10.

    Craziness is a tough one. She's not manifested any public mental illness symptoms I'm aware of. Except one. And it's a big one, folks. She married freaking Tom Cruise, people. Just for that, I'm giving her a 25. Why? Because it's my column, and I can.

    Her global notoriety is really reflected notoriety. But what a reflection it is. Her husband is the grand poohbah of sketchy religious thought, the high panjandrum of flim-flammery dressed up as pseudo-religion. Even as a pale reflection of the cult-powered notoriety of her whacked-out husband, Katie deserves a 14 out of 20.

    All things being equal, Katie would seem like a soccer mom. She dresses modestly, she behaves with decorum in public. By rights, she should get about 2 out of 30 in our last category. But, as you know, she pulled out the scandal trump cards by serving as a skin-temperature test tube for Tom Cruise and L. Ron Hubbard's love child. Surely, that merits a 20 even in someone who is otherwise as scandalous as Jo from Supernanny. Besides, she showed her boobies in The Gift. 20 out of 30; final overall score, 69 (thanks, Tom!)

    So, let's recap:

    Posh Spice - 35/100
    Nicole Richie - 41/100
    Jessica Simpson - 43/100
    Angelina Jolie - 51/100
    Lindsay Lohan - 61/100
    Katie Holmes - 69/100
    Britney Spears - 76/100

    Ding ding ding! We have a winner, folks! The new Primary Sources-endorsed Queen of the Scandal Sheets, the Totalitarian of the Tabloids, the Empress of the Enquirer is:

    Paris Hilton - 77/100

    (Hey, was there every really any doubt?)

    Mike Walker, you're free to use this scientific, criteria-weighted approach in developing your slate of articles in the future. All I ask is that you refer to it as the Synthesis Scandal Sheet Scale.

    You're welcome.

    • 24 Votes
    • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

    Back To Top

    What's this?
    Who's leading the conversation?
    This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
    51
    11
    7.4
    {"commentId":1620110,"authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}

    I'll be the first to admit that I've sunk to new depths with this article. But, hey, don't judge me. You have no idea how huge my support payments are.

    {"commentId":1620110,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
    • 5 votes
    Reply#1 - Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:28 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1623905,"authorDomain":"wharrison55"}

    I still think Brit's gotta top Paris and I'd have thrown a vote or two trainwreck wise to Amy Winehouse who may be, however, below zero on the hotness scale.

    {"commentId":1623905,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"wharrison55"}
    • 2 votes
    #1.1 - Wed Mar 26, 2008 9:24 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1623947,"authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}

    Heh. You're right about Amy, for sure. She's a definite Ol '96 on the tracks...did you see the before and after pic that was commenting on her drug use? She was actually not quite terrible at one point.

    As for the Brit vs Paris question...well, only one point separated them, so they were pretty close. It would take only one night out at Hyde to change the standings, I'd say...

    {"commentId":1623947,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
    • 1 vote
    #1.2 - Wed Mar 26, 2008 9:36 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1624147,"authorDomain":"wharrison55"}

    I had to go with Brit based on the regional pride bias, i.e. classic low-trottin' white trash behavior. And she's still MILF material in my book. ;>0

    {"commentId":1624147,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"wharrison55"}
      #1.3 - Wed Mar 26, 2008 10:29 PM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":1620597,"authorDomain":"MinnieApolis"}

      Hilarious. I give ya a ten on this.
      One omission on your part, tho -- RE the Katie Holmes act. There was also the did-she-or-did-she-not run that marathon??? Did she have that substitute run alongside her, wearing her number or however they rigged it? I mean, there was no way she made an appearance the next day if she had run a marathon for real.
      BTW you left out the part where Paris swore off sex for one year. Riiight.
      I'd like to see one more name, maybe 2, on the list, sil vous plait. Kristen has come out of nowhere -- the Eliot Spitzer girl. Has a ton of upside potential here. And the amazing seeing-double twins, Mary Kate and Ashley. Also we have not heard from Wynona Judd lately but she really racked up the points for a while there. Hey, has Madonna died or something that she is off the map?
      While we are at it we should really designate a Champions Wing of the SSSS -- consisting of Cher, Liz Taylor, and possibly Debbie Reynolds (her life would fill a soap opera).
      Oh, and you forgot the 'hot chicks' tag. You're slipping.

      {"commentId":1620597,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"MinnieApolis"}
      • 3 votes
      Reply#2 - Wed Mar 26, 2008 2:01 AM EDT
      {"commentId":1623287,"authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
      Hilarious. I give ya a ten on this.

      Thanks, Minnie...I don't do humour all that often, so I wanted to give it a try with this one.

      the did-she-or-did-she-not run that marathon???

      Hmmm. Does that fall under Scandalous Behaviour or Global Notoriety?

      Paris swore off sex for one year.

      Heh. I guess I missed that one.

      And yeah, Eliot Spitzer's hooker could have been on the list...but I think she's too much a flash in the pan to make the top 8 (or even top 10). As it was, I had to leave Pammy Anderson off...a major regret I have.

      Mary Kate and Ashley...yeah, I could see that. I didn't know Wynona Judd was such a tab queen (although Winona Ryder racked up points a few years back, too, and she's apparently up to her old tricks...)

      I really like your Champions Wing idea. The greatest, most scandalous of all time. I think I'll do it as a follow-up to this one.

      And as for the hot-chicks tag, you're so right! I seeded it to the group, but didn't use the tag. Freakin' amateur. I'll fix that right now.

      MinnieApolis, I appreciate all your thoughts! Thanks!

      {"commentId":1623287,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
      • 2 votes
      #2.1 - Wed Mar 26, 2008 5:57 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1624356,"authorDomain":"MinnieApolis"}

      You know, till now I had NOOO idea I had any instincts in the pandering consultancy field.
      But you're my first, so you get it for free. Lucky you.

      {"commentId":1624356,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"MinnieApolis"}
      • 3 votes
      #2.2 - Wed Mar 26, 2008 11:32 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1626833,"authorDomain":"MinnieApolis"}

      Actually I think the original definition of 'famous for being famous' was Zsa Zsa Gabor. But you can add her to the Champions list. Multiple marriages and a gang of sisters -- they must have all had a merry old time.
      May I also suggest an 'up and coming' list??? Is that stretching too far? I was thinking perhaps the Mary Kate and Ashley twins, the younger Spears, the older but apparently disintegrating Heather Mills. They all have a lot of upside potential, don't you think?
      Whatever happened to Carmen Electra and Lisa Marie Presley anyway?

      {"commentId":1626833,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"MinnieApolis"}
      • 2 votes
      #2.3 - Thu Mar 27, 2008 2:47 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1628020,"authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}

      I will only consider the up and coming list idea if I can write about Hayden Panetierre.

      She's doing fine right now, but she could easily implode at any moment, likely due to post-traumatic stress syndrome triggered by the repressed memories from that terrible dolphin incident.

      {"commentId":1628020,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
      • 2 votes
      #2.4 - Thu Mar 27, 2008 7:36 PM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":1620803,"authorDomain":"brendamayer"}

      Hey Synth,

      Too funny! Hope your pandering works out for ya.

      I'm developing a theory that Paris Hilton may be some sort of vampire/immortal beast. Evidence.

      {"commentId":1620803,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"brendamayer"}
      • 3 votes
      Reply#3 - Wed Mar 26, 2008 6:28 AM EDT
      {"commentId":1623300,"authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
      Too funny!

      Thanks, Brenda. Like I said above, I typically stay away from humour, so I had a lot of fun with this one. It was liberating! Whether the pandering works out or not, we'll see...if Flickr had more revealling photos, I bet it would generate a whole whack-load of page views from Google Images. But we work with what we've got...

      nakedness and from their emphasized sexual organs

      OMG, Brenda. I think you may be right!

      {"commentId":1623300,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
      • 1 vote
      #3.1 - Wed Mar 26, 2008 6:02 PM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":1620831,"authorDomain":"bigmomma"}

      This is too funny! I hope it works out for you.....please be sure to report back to us on how successful you are with breaking Google Analytics. I think it will work!

      {"commentId":1620831,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"bigmomma"}
      • 3 votes
      Reply#4 - Wed Mar 26, 2008 6:56 AM EDT
      {"commentId":1623306,"authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}

      I will do that, Rottlady. I'm not sure if I can predict what will happen or not, as I am yet only a paduan in the labyrinthine ways of Google Analytics.

      But whatever happens, I'll report back on this thread. Is it too late to check it tonight, I wonder?

      {"commentId":1623306,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
      • 2 votes
      #4.1 - Wed Mar 26, 2008 6:03 PM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":1623523,"authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}

      There. I edited this article, replacing the tame Flickr pics with racier ones in the hopes of inflating my Analytics score by reeling in searchers using Google Images. I've attributed them all, but strangely, I don't think any of these sources is the original owner of this particular intellectual (?) property.

      {"commentId":1623523,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
      • 3 votes
      Reply#5 - Wed Mar 26, 2008 7:23 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1624028,"authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}

      Synth:

      Er. You need to have the most-searched for term in the caption to the image if you want the image searches to pick it up.

      Ask me how I know.

      :^{)>

      {"commentId":1624028,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}
      • 3 votes
      #5.1 - Wed Mar 26, 2008 9:55 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1624146,"authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}

      How do you know, Jack. And any suggestions for the most-searched term (aside from 'boobs', I mean...)?

      {"commentId":1624146,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
      • 1 vote
      #5.2 - Wed Mar 26, 2008 10:29 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1624164,"authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}

      Hmm...okay...latest edit was to find the logical place in each caption to insert words like "lingerie", "bikini", "topless", "nude", etc.

      Now that oughta do it...!

      {"commentId":1624164,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
        #5.3 - Wed Mar 26, 2008 10:35 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1624208,"authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}

        Synth:

        On an article about the theory of art/writing that was one of the first articles I wrote for NV, I grabbed a public-domain picture of Adolph Hitler and Leni Refenstahl and simply captioned it "Adolph Hitler and Leni Refenstahl" and I was still getting pageviews in the triple digits from that six months later.

        {"commentId":1624208,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}
        • 3 votes
        #5.4 - Wed Mar 26, 2008 10:46 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1624263,"authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}

        So I should simply make each caption read:

        Britney Spears nude; Paris Hilton nude; Jessica Simpson nude, etc.?

        Hmmm. I really should, in the name of science. But that would be too crass even for me...LoL.

        {"commentId":1624263,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
        • 1 vote
        #5.5 - Wed Mar 26, 2008 11:03 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1624302,"authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}

        Synth:

        Yup. Except you'll get a mob of angry image googlers coming after you with torches and pitchforks since they aren't really nude in those pics (except for Lindsay Lohan).

        {"commentId":1624302,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}
        • 4 votes
        #5.6 - Wed Mar 26, 2008 11:14 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1628049,"authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}

        Jeez, I dunno...that Paris Hilton pic looked pretty nude to me. I mean, I don't know what the fashionistas say, but a mike cord does not a party dress make, in my view...

        {"commentId":1628049,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
        • 1 vote
        #5.7 - Thu Mar 27, 2008 7:49 PM EDT
        Reply
        {"commentId":1625215,"authorDomain":"fitzright"}

        So Britney has a tattoo in her not so private parts region? Thanks, Synthesis, I got smarter.

        {"commentId":1625215,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"fitzright"}
        • 3 votes
        Reply#6 - Thu Mar 27, 2008 8:51 AM EDT
        {"commentId":1628052,"authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}

        Heh. Yup. She has a tramp stamp in her pants.

        {"commentId":1628052,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
        • 4 votes
        #6.1 - Thu Mar 27, 2008 7:49 PM EDT
        Reply
        {"commentId":1628125,"authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}

        Well, here's my first report. So far, so good. This article has been up for just under 48 hours, and so far Google Analytics shows 1,922 pageviews, 1856 unique.

        Most puzzling? The majority seem to be coming from within Newsvine. So much for my Google keywords strategy...on the other hand, thanks Newsvine! (I had no idea there were so many lurkers out there!)

        And mostpuzzling? Puzzlinger? Here are the keywords that people used to get there...

      • aniston
      • nick lachey
      • queen
      • tom cruise
      • what gets better gas mileage one or four barrel carburetor
      • WTF!!???

        *sighs*

        I'm never gonna figure out the internets...

        {"commentId":1628125,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
        • 2 votes
        Reply#7 - Thu Mar 27, 2008 8:12 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1628400,"authorDomain":"bigmomma"}
        what gets better gas mileage one or four barrel carburetor

        oh that's too funny....

        {"commentId":1628400,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"bigmomma"}
        • 3 votes
        #7.1 - Thu Mar 27, 2008 9:48 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1641620,"authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}

        It is, isn't it.

        I'm mysterified. And dumbfounded.

        {"commentId":1641620,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
        • 1 vote
        #7.2 - Mon Mar 31, 2008 7:53 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1641755,"authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}

        OK, here we are four days later, and the count is 4,235 page views and counting. By far my biggest tally ever. I guess my experiment is working....

        {"commentId":1641755,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
        • 2 votes
        #7.3 - Mon Mar 31, 2008 8:25 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1641774,"authorDomain":"bigmomma"}
        4,235 page views

        I guess so, I'm lucky if I get that in a month...*goes to do an article on hot chicks*

        {"commentId":1641774,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"bigmomma"}
        • 2 votes
        #7.4 - Mon Mar 31, 2008 8:29 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1641804,"authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
        I'm lucky if I get that in a month

        Not long ago, that was me, too....this "tagging as a snare for unwary googlers bit" seems to really work! (It's true, though....hot chicks articles seem to really work for generating traffic, and traffic that keeps on going and going. My third-most popular item in analytics is an article I did on Top Ten Canadian Hot Chicks probably close to a year ago, and I'm still raking in hits on it.)

        So,..."Hot Chicks Forever!" Woo hoooo!

        *looks around embarassedly, wondering if anyone just saw that...*

        {"commentId":1641804,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
        • 2 votes
        #7.5 - Mon Mar 31, 2008 8:38 PM EDT
        Reply
        {"commentId":1631155,"authorDomain":"LAUHAL63"}

        buh buh buh buh buh buh

        {"commentId":1631155,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"LAUHAL63"}
        • 4 votes
        Reply#8 - Fri Mar 28, 2008 4:09 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1641623,"authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}

        Lau, are you speechless? Or just motorboating....?

        {"commentId":1641623,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
        • 1 vote
        #8.1 - Mon Mar 31, 2008 7:54 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1641630,"authorDomain":"LAUHAL63"}

        shpeechlesh!

        {"commentId":1641630,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"LAUHAL63"}
        • 2 votes
        #8.2 - Mon Mar 31, 2008 7:56 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1641706,"authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}

        Now, is that good speechless, bad speechless, or other?

        Be specific....

        {"commentId":1641706,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
        • 1 vote
        #8.3 - Mon Mar 31, 2008 8:15 PM EDT
        Reply
        {"commentId":2051111,"authorDomain":"TeddRi"}

        Oh woah....almost forgot about this priceless gem !

        {"commentId":2051111,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"TeddRi"}
        • 4 votes
        Reply#9 - Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:29 PM EDT
        {"commentId":2051390,"authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}

        Hehehe. Yeah, I had a lot of fun writing this one...another nice break from my usual material...

        {"commentId":2051390,"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126","authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
        • 2 votes
        #9.1 - Wed Jun 25, 2008 11:30 PM EDT
        Reply
        {"canLink":false,"threadId":"240071","isPrivate":false}
        Leave a Comment:
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
        {"threadId":"240071","contentId":"1390126"}
        Start TrackingStart Tracking
        Stop TrackingStop Tracking