Log In | Register
Something is happening.
When it comes to the question of chemtrails, the knee-jerk reaction of the skeptics is to dismiss them as silly rantings, while the committed opinion of those more likely to adhere to conspiracy theories is that the New World Order is using them to effect a population control agenda. As so often is the case, the truth is likely to be somewhere in between, but it's becoming increasingly difficult to ignore the likelihood that something is happening.
What we don't know is who is responsible for the chemtrails phenomenon, and what their motivations are. In this article, we'll explore some of the issues, in an attempt to provide some hypotheses. In the end, however, only you - the reader - can decide where the truth lies.
One of the most prevalent theories is that chemtrails are a relatively new phenomenon; that they can be distinguished from the condensation trails (contrails) typical of aircraft passage by their persistence. In short, contrails are said to be short-lived, while the newer chemtrails are more long-lived.
The U.S. Air Force categorically denies this point, saying in AFD-051013-001 Contrails Facts:
Contrails can remain visible for very long periods of time with the lifetime a function of the temperature, humidity, winds, and aircraft exhaust characteristics. Contrails can form many shapes as they are dispersed by horizontal and vertical wind shear. Sunlight refracted or reflected from contrails can produce vibrant and eye-catching colors and patterns. Observation and scientific analysis of contrails and their duration date back to at least 1953.
Research for this article was unable to find information validating the thesis that 'natural' contrails dissipate more rapidly than what are perceived to be Chemtrails, but in most ways, this particular distinction is pointless. That is, if the contention is that the contrails we are currently experiencing today are, in fact, causing harm, and now contain additives that do so, does it matter if we call them contrails or chemtrails? (Author's Note: it does still seem to be true that contrails can only be formed above 26,000 feet, and then only if the ambient air temperature is below -40 degrees C. Any vapour trails below that threshold, or in warmer conditions, must continue to be viewed with suspicion. See image number 5 accompanying this article.)
Studies suggest that condensation trails regularly spread out to become cirrus clouds, and are sometimes referred to as anthropogenic cirrus clouds.
Increases in cirrus coverage or decreased sunshine have been linked to jet air traffic over parts of the contiguous United States (see Changnon 1981; Sassen 1997) and Alaska (Nakanishi et al. 2001) for many years. Trends in regional cirrus frequency of occurrence are strongly correlated with high-altitude airplane fuel consumption between 1982 and 1991 (Boucher 1999).
So, vapour trails (whether they are called contrails or chemtrails) are causing increased production of cirrus cloud formations, and according to Patrick Minnis of NASA's Langley Research Center, primary author of the study we cited earlier, they have an impact on climate via something called 'radiative forcing'.
This study indicates that contrails already have substantial regional effects where air traffic is heavy. As air travel continues growing in other areas, the impact may become globally significant.
Radiative forcing is defined by MIT as being "a direct measure of the amount that the Earth's energy budget is out of balance".
Leaving aside the controversial question of anthropogenic global warming (AGW) for a moment, we shouldn't be surprised to find that human intervention via dispersal of particulates can cause imbalances, or changes in "Earth's energy budget". Also known as 'geoengineering', the concept has been discussed in science and governance circles since the middle of the 20th century.
In 1965, President Lyndon Johnson's Science Advisory Committee sounded the alarm regarding climate change. The committee's Environmental Pollution Panel wrote a report entitled Restoring the Quality of our Environment, in which they found "the climatic changes that may be produced by the increased CO2 content could be deleterious from the point of view of human beings. The possibilities of deliberately bringing about countervailing climate changes therefore need to be thoroughly explored."
More problematic, was the panel's additional suggestion that "a change in the radiation balance in the opposite direction to that which may result from the increase in atmospheric CO2 could be produced by reducing the albedo, or reflectivity, of the earth. Such a change in albedo could be brought about by, for example by spreading very small reflecting particles over large oceanic areas." The report also recommended investigation of "injection of condensation or freezing nuclei [to] cause cirrus clouds to form at high altitudes."
While the proposals for increasing the planet's albedo were rejected on the grounds of their theoretical nature and potentially dangerous effects, research into radiation management solutions never ceased, and increased in pace toward the latter portion of the century as the dire predictions of the Environmental Panel edged ever closer to grim reality. Noted 'big science' heavyweights including Dr. Edward Teller, father of the hydrogen bomb, produced research on the topic. On March 26, 1991, the Hughes Aircraft Corporation was assigned and awarded U.S. Patent 5,003,186, for Welsbach Refractory Seeding Agents, and designed to mitigate the effects of global warming as follows:
seeding the layer of heat-trapping gases in the atmosphere with particles of materials characterized by wavelength-dependent emissivity. Such materials include Welsbach materials [barium, aluminum, thorium and selenium], and the oxides of metals which have high emissivity (and thus low reflectivities) in the visible and 8-12 micron infrared wavelength regions.
The patent, filed on behalf of Hughes (Delco) and inventors I-Fu Shih (optical engineer) and David B. Chang specifically mentions aluminum oxide as being suitable due to its relatively low cost, recommending particles ranging in size from 10 to 100 microns -- small enough not to settle to earth too quickly. Further specified in the patent is a seeding altitude of approximately 10 kilometers, or 33,000 feet.
The particles may be seeded by dispersal from seeding aircraft; one exemplary technique may be via jet fuel as suggested by prior work regarding the metallic particles. Once the tiny particles have been dispersed into the atmosphere, the particles may remain in suspension for up to one year.
Less than a year after the Hughes patent was issued, the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine unveiled a massive 994-page study called Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming: Mitigation, Adaptation, and the Science Base - Panel on Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming. Among its findings was the following:
the most effective global warming mitigation turned out to be the spraying of reflective aerosol compounds into the atmosphere utilizing commercial, military and private aircraft. This preferred mitigation method is designed to create a global atmospheric shield which would increase the planet's albedo (reflectivity)using aerosol compounds of aluminum and barium oxides, and to introduce ozone generating chemicals into the atmosphere. This method was the most cost effective, and yielded the largest benefits. It could also be conducted covertly to avoid the burdens of environmental protection and regulatory entanglements.
According to chemtrails researcher, and author of The Methodic Demise of Planet Earth, Dr. R. Michael Castle, Welsbach Refractory Seeding under unrestricted deployment operations began shortly thereafter, in the early 1990's.
Thought to be among those operations was one which was code-named Project Cloverleaf, initially led by the Central Intelligence Agency, and later to become a joint U.S.-Canadian military operation. Numerous figures involved in Op Cloverleaf have stepped forward to describe their participation. These insiders have included air traffic controllers, aircraft maintenance personnel and spray system manufacturing employees.
Other programs that have been implicated in the injection of atmospheric particulates include the U.S. Navy's Radio Frequency Mission Planner (RFMP) project.
Radio Frequency Mission Planner (RFMP) program, which is a system encompassing a group of computer programs. One of its supporting subprograms is know as Variable Terrain Radio Parabolic Equation or VTRPE. This is a computer radio frequency propagation program that deals with radio waves and enables the RFMP system to visually see the terrain of a battlefield in three dimensions on a television-type screen. The RFMP system also depends on a satellites to supplement the images of a battlefield picture obtained from the ground, thus producing the 3-dimensional images. In providing an interactive picture portraying in the radar screen, the RFMP system allows the computer operator to develop familiarity with the "environment" before a war mission occurs by playing a variety of "what if?" virtual warfare scenarios on his computer screen. Since all major modes of radio frequency propagation are modeled in his computer (the RFMP system), special, sometimes counter-intuitive, cases can be examined in detail and exploited during a battle. Initially, the VTRPE computer program only worked accurately over water and along coastal areas but not over land masses because the system's radar waves required an atmospheric condition known as "ducting," over land, to operate accurately.
This "ducting" problem was solved by releasing an aerosol, a mixture of barium salts into the atmosphere over the United States. Thus, they can make an atmospheric radio frequency "duct" with a base of barium aerosol released from aircraft.
RFMP and other, even more exotic, aerosol injection geoengineering programs remain compartmentalized as 'black' projects:
"The programs remain secret because the Environmental Protection Agency and state environmental agencies need 'not know' about the by-products of the metabolites of these biological, illegal and harmful agents," said one of the researchers. "It's for that reason the combined projects have been kept secret from the citizens."
Indeed, the harmful effects of some of these geoengineering projects in general would fill a considerable laundry list, but the health effects of the Welsbach materials in particular are becoming clear, with aluminum oxide, for example, exhibiting not only intensified concentrations in soil and water, but also now implicated as a causal factor in the maladies that most characterize our 21st century lifestyle.
As background, we should begin with the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for aluminum, which gives some insight into that alloy's native hazards, and by extension, those of various aluminum derivatives, such as aluminum oxide.
Chronic exposure to aluminum dust may cause dyspnea, cough, asthma, chronic obstructive lung
disease, pulmonary fibrosis, pneumothorax, pneumoconiosis, encephalopathy, weakness, incoordination and epileptiform seizures and other neurological symptoms similar to that described for chronic ingestion. Hepatic necrosis is also a reported effect of exposure to airborne particulates carrying aluminum. Ingestion: Chronic ingestion of aluminum may cause Aluminum Related Bone Disease or aluminum-induced Osteomalacia with fracturing Osteodystrophy, microcytic anemia, weakness, fatigue, visual and auditory hallucinations, memory loss, speech and language impairment (dysarthria, stuttering, stammering, anomia, hypofluency, aphasia and eventually, mutism), epileptic seizures(focal or grand mal), motor disturbance(tremors, myoclonic jerks, ataxia, convulsions, asterixis, motor apraxia, muscle fatigue), and dementia (personality changes, altered mood, depression, diminished alertness, lethargy, 'clouding of the sensorium', intellectual deterioration, obtundation, coma), and altered EEG.
The neurotoxicity symptoms comprising the latter part of this list become even more intriguing when we consider that the role of aluminum in the pathology of Alzheimer's Disease has been suspected for nearly 100 years, when aluminum was first investigated as a mediator of toxicity by Dollken in 1897. While opinions remain divided, there is certainly a body of evidence which does point to a between aluminum ingestion and Alzheimer's - as some have referred to it, a correlation between a 20th century material and a 20th century disease.
a recent systematic review on the existing scientific evidence of the relation between Al exposure and the risk of development of AD showed that among the 34 studies selected, 68% established a relation between Al and AD, 23.5% were inconclusive, and 8.5% did not establish a relation between Al and AD.
If it's true that exposure to aluminum is a risk factor for Alzheimer's, and if it's true that our soils and air are being increasingly contaminated with aluminum oxide and other Welsbach materials as a result of large-scale atmospheric seeding projects, it provides a potential solution to the mystery of why "a rising tide" of the disease is not only claiming more victims than ever, but is now affecting younger and younger populations.
Of the half-million Canadians affected by various forms of dementia, about 71,000 — or almost 15 per cent — are under age 65, says a study by the Alzheimer Society of Canada. Of those, about 50,000 are 59 or younger.
"We know that we're finding far more individuals in their 50s and 60s who have dementia," said society CEO Scott Dudgeon. "We're talking about dementia generally, including Alzheimer's disease."
If aluminum has such a high level of neurotoxicity, is it possible that it may be a culprit in another class of mental illnesses that have become a virtual plague in modern times, mood disorders? Naturopathic and holistic health practitioners have cautioned patients against exposure to heavy metals for many years, with many of them drawing a connection between their ingestion and disorders such as Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Bipolar Disorder, and even fibromyalgia. Dr. Raymond J. Pataracchia B.Sc., N.D., of the Naturopathic Medical Research Clinic in Toronto, says:
It is not uncommon to see toxic levels of lead, mercury, aluminum, and copper on lab test results of mood and behaviour disorder patients. Most heavy metals are free radicals that induce oxidative stress (lipid peroxidation) and have a direct affinity for brain tissue. Heavy metal free-radicals have the ability to compromise brain tissue structure and metabolism. Toxic metal imbalances are associated with mood and behavior disorders.
Heavy metals make the body's metal removing protein, metallothionein, work hard to excrete them. In the process of ridding heavy metals, this protein loses zinc which further compromises the ability to transcribe brain proteins including neurotransmitters.
Aluminum can be toxic in patients with mood and behavior disorders and, digestive pathologies...aluminum is more soluble in our acidic magnesium deficient drinking water.
Mood disorders are among the most rapidly growing forms of mental illness affecting our society today, with direct and indirect costs in the multiple billions of dollars. And worse, the cost is growing at astronomical rates. Of these mood disorders, bipolar disorder is one of the more destructive, so it is troubling to find that it, in particular, not only seems to be increasing in incidence, but with no equivalent understanding as to its causes.
The number of visits to a doctor's office that resulted in a diagnosis of bipolar disorder in children and adolescents has increased by 40 times over the last decade, reported researchers funded in part by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Over the same time period, the number of visits by adults resulting in a bipolar disorder diagnosis almost doubled. The cause of these increases is unclear. Medication prescription patterns for the two groups were similar. The study was published in the September 2007 issue of the Archives of General Psychiatry.
Nor are other Welsbach materials free of deleterious human effects, and some, like Barium, are notable for their non-human environmental effects and characteristics. In one report, the World Health Organization advised that "soluble barium and suspended particulates can be transported great distances in rivers, depending on the rates of flow and sedimentation. In the absence of any possible removal mechanisms, the residence time of barium in aquatic systems could be several hundred years". The WHO further noted that "barium directly affects the physico-chemical properties as well as the infectivity of several viruses and their ability to multiply. It also affects the development of germinating bacterial spores and has a variety of specific effects on different microorganisms, including
the inhibition of cellular processes.
This last observation provides strong support for the contention of the documentary What in the World are They Spraying, which found a direct relationship between chemtrail activity and degraded plant growth and sustainability. It is also of more than passing interest that companies such as Monsanto are conducting research into the development of genetically modified plants that possess greater resistance to the toxicity of heavy metals such as aluminum.
A new generation of genetically engineered (GE) crop research aims to alleviate these pressures through the improvement of subsistence crops—such as cassava, sorghum, and millet—that incorporate traits such as tolerance to drought, water, and aluminum in soils as well as plants with more efficient nitrogen and phosphorus use.
Given what we've found in researching this article, it seems likely that Welsbach seeding is being experimented with as a means of mitigating greenhouse effects. It seems equally probable that these efforts are being conducted on an extremely large scale, as is recommended by most of the studies that proposed its use. But, given what we've learned about the numerous ill-effects listed here related to the Welsbach materials, how could those responsible for those programs possibly justify the trade-off? Why would they go to such limits to circumvent environmental and public health regulations, even given the dire nature of the perceived climate threat? Doesn't it constitute killing the patient to treat it?
Perhaps.
Then again, if the proponents of the New World Order (NWO) population reduction hypothesis are correct, there would be few more effective methods for instituting a global method of gradual homicide. As we've found, the chemtrail/seeding method is not only capable of injecting lifespan-limiting diseases into the population, but simultaneously impacts the cognitive abilities of those subject to the process while impairing the ability of those without access to seeds modified by international corporations to sustain themselves.
Still, the goal of this article is not to evaluate the veracity of the NWO population control hypothesis, but to investigate the chemtrails phenomenon.
The subject of another article?
Perhaps.
